By Dwight Swanson
For evangelical Christians, sharing one’s faith with non-Christians (i.e., ‘witnessing’, or ‘evangelism’) is among the basics of belief. However, most find this very difficult to do. There are many reasons for this, chiefly, I imagine, is that when something is made an obligation it becomes awkward to implement. The word ‘evangel’, from which evangelical and evangel derive, is a simple transliteration of the Greek work which appears in the Bible for ‘bring good news’. It referred to any sort of good news, but usually something grand, like in the Priam Inscription of ca 6 BC which celebrated the birthday of Caesar Augustus. It was applied by the New Testament writers to the event of Jesus’ life, death and resurrection. ‘Evangelism’, then, is simply relating this good news. But, it has come in evangelical terms to mean speaking to non-Christians with the specific purpose of encouraging them to make an on-the-spot commitment to become a Christian.
Thus, in evange-speak, sharing good news requires a programme, a plan, and a strategy. The effort creates fear in the committed believer who wishes to be true to his faith by witnessing. The results are often awkward—an indication that such methods are not normal.
This past week I have read two separate accounts by non-Christians of ways in which such witnessing suffers the results of the ‘law of unintended consequences’. The first was found in a most surprising place—the sports supplement of the newspaper. You can read it here link (more)
Media Watch
What would Jesus do at the Ryder Cup?

The Occasional # 132
Faith in Kazakhstan
By Dwight Swanson
Yes, I have been to Kazakhstan; but that is like saying I’ve been to America after flying into Denver and spending a week in the mountains. I have seen a bit of this country on the borders of Europe and Asia. The only flight from Moscow leaves at midnight and arrives (with a two-hour time difference) in Astana at 6:00 a.m. The traveller’s interests are obviously placed first by the authorities! Astana, the new capital city of Kazakhstan, is a city bustling with construction, and government buildings meant to impress—monumental in almost Soviet style. I stayed in a flat in a new high-rise complex in the new part of the city. From my 17th storey vantage point I could see the cranes of new construction in every direction. This is a city in a hurry. (more)

Yes, I have been to Kazakhstan; but that is like saying I’ve been to America after flying into Denver and spending a week in the mountains. I have seen a bit of this country on the borders of Europe and Asia. The only flight from Moscow leaves at midnight and arrives (with a two-hour time difference) in Astana at 6:00 a.m. The traveller’s interests are obviously placed first by the authorities! Astana, the new capital city of Kazakhstan, is a city bustling with construction, and government buildings meant to impress—monumental in almost Soviet style. I stayed in a flat in a new high-rise complex in the new part of the city. From my 17th storey vantage point I could see the cranes of new construction in every direction. This is a city in a hurry. (more)

An Occasional Special
"9/11" Remembered
By Dwight Swanson
On the fifth anniversary of the destruction of the twin towers of the World Trade Center, the Daily Gazelle publishes correspondence from the Occasional #85, following that event. The following article begins with the Editor's first personal reaction to 9/11. Then, email correspondence follows. Names have been omitted, and personal identifying remarks are excised; otherwise, the comments remain as received. The final section is the Occasional #86.
The purpose in publishing these is to offer initial responses, close to the original event and free of influence from the years of commentary and revisionism that have followed. They help to remember the questions raised from the beginning--and so, hopefully, help to evaluate the intervening years of events and opinion.
(more)
On the fifth anniversary of the destruction of the twin towers of the World Trade Center, the Daily Gazelle publishes correspondence from the Occasional #85, following that event. The following article begins with the Editor's first personal reaction to 9/11. Then, email correspondence follows. Names have been omitted, and personal identifying remarks are excised; otherwise, the comments remain as received. The final section is the Occasional #86.
The purpose in publishing these is to offer initial responses, close to the original event and free of influence from the years of commentary and revisionism that have followed. They help to remember the questions raised from the beginning--and so, hopefully, help to evaluate the intervening years of events and opinion.
(more)

default -

